Skip to main content

Week 12

This week in class, we discussed the foundations of constructing a research paper. Using the CRAAP test, we can evaluate whether the sources we used are relevant or credible enough to be used in our research essays. Luckily for us (thanks to our FYE teacher), we do not have to actually write a research paper, which is nice. Not to mention, as honors students, we should already be pretty familiar with writing research papers so it's nice to catch a break.

 The CRAAP test helps us evaluate the sources in five categories: Currency, Relevancy, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. If the source passes all five of the test parameters, then it is a viable source to be utilized. If it fails to meet some criteria, then you should have a look for another source in order to keep your research paper as professional as possible.

 My (fake) research paper topic is about the behavior of ants resembles human civilization and the parallels that can be made between the two species is fascinating. The social structure of an ant colony is not too different from ours. The call for violence through wars in both species are started by a desire or infringement on territory or necessary resources. There are many other astounding comparisons that can be made, but this blog post is about finding the right sources for a paper.

 The first source I found is Ant Wars. It is a site largely recognized for its interesting articles written by experts in their respective fields. This article was written in 2016 by Sean O'Donnell, PhD; Associate Department Head, Professor, Department of Biodiversity, Earth & Environmental Science, Drexel University. In his article, he also references other credible researchers and adds their information to support his conclusions. It was an informative article and to my amateur-knowledge, there was no misinformation.

 The second source is from the Discover search through Georgia Southern. "Like Ants: A Model for Human Civilization?" is a very interesting (but long) article where the author, Andy Turnbull, finds in-depth comparisons between ant and human civilizations and what makes them work, survive, and thrive. Andy uses the comparisons to ask the audience, "Ants have existed for 100 times longer than humans and our civilization parallels theirs, so what makes them work and where do humans fall of that path?" Although I cannot seem to find information on the author's background and credibility, the article was written in 2017 and seems like a very educated and informative document.

 Image result for ant


Sources:
http://serious-science.org/ant-wars-6652
https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=cd5d1de8-1aad-4229-9a5c-9123528ea5eb%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHNoaWI%3d#db=e900xww&AN=1637064

Comments

  1. Matthew ANovember 10, 2019 at 2:32 PM

    That's a pretty cool and interesting topic you choose. I would have never thought about the civilization pattern and structure for ants and humans. The "CRAAP" test is a pretty useful tool. I enjoyed reading this blog post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 9

Carrying over from the events and blog post from last week, we are still discussing diversity and the events that happened at Georgia Southern University last week. In class, we are dissecting the term "white privilege" and trying to gather a more well-rounded to understanding the inherent biases of our society. Following up with white privilege , it really opened my eyes to what it truly means and it's NOT socioeconomic status, which is usually the cause of ignorance for most. It is better defined through examples. A white man walks into a gas station at night with a hood, the clerk may not be as tensed or on edge as if a black man were to walk in with a hood. A white man is less likely to be questioned by the police vs a black man. These situations don't always occur, but they occur often enough to where they are seen as a commonality. It's not fair. It really isn't. But that's the world we live in now. The media also seems to get more attention and re...
1 comment
Read more

Week 13

The last two weeks we talked about Che Guevara, the infamous guerrilla fighter and master of rebellion. But who was he before his surge to infamy? We watched The Motorcycle Diaries   in class which explains his background. If you did not know that the main character IS Che Guevara, you would never make the connection. The movie does not indulge in Che's career as a fighter but only his travels as a doctor with his friend, Alberto. Together, they traveled around South America, exploring new cultures and helping people along the way. The movie portrayed as a very nice, kind, sympathetic man, passionate about making a difference to people. To many, Che is still that sort of Saint, but many others see his dark side, leading thousands of executions in his warpath for communism. The movie does an excellent job of turning your point of view to sympathize with this man and making him the protagonist. Even if you knew a little about Che beforehand, you still felt this feeling of "I wa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 4

Two major topics we covered this week in classes were Growth vs Fixed mindsets and cheating/plagiarism. We had separate discussions about each but the two topics are actually related very closely. Let's divulge. First, lets break apart the difference between a fixed mindset and a growth mindset. A fixed mindset is the belief that one is born with a certain capacity of knowledge for a skill like academics or sports and do not have much motivation to achieve more than what they think can be achieved. Growth mindsets on the other hand is the belief that knowledge is limitless. It's more about focusing on the process to achieve your goals and in turn, expanding your knowledge of skills by fully understanding the process. The " neuroplasticity " video explains the science behind how your brain creates new neurological pathways to store and process skills, which is pretty neat. The " Introduction to a Growth Mindset " video goes more in depth about the reasoning...
2 comments
Read more